Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV)
- Vulnerabilities
- Binding Operational Directive
- Cybersecurity
- Enterprise
- Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures
- Network Operator
- Data Center
- AI infrastructure
Show 56 more topics
- Threats
- Services
- Remediation
- Artificial Intelligence
- Operating System
- Networking
- Software
- Cloud
- Server
- Bandwidth on Demand
- Partnership
- Market
- Authentication
- Automation
- Compliance
- Connectivity
- Observability
- Open Source
- Protection
- Secure Access Service Edge
- Router
- Cross-Site Scripting
- Quantum Computing
- Mergers and Acquisitions
- Optical Networking
- Application
- Common Vulnerability Scoring System
- Edge
- Industrial Control Systems
- Leadership
- Open RAN
- AI-Driven
- Attack
- Denial of Service
- Domain Name System
- Generative AI
- Industry
- Model Context Protocol
- Monitoring
- Password
- Power
- Threat Detection
- AI factory
- Broadband
- Cloud Native
- Core Network
- Fiber
- gateway
- Indicators of Compromise
- IT Governance
- Malware Analysis
- Multifactor Authentication
- Operational technology
- Privacy
- Radio Access Network
- Ransomware
2 organizations in our directory are tagged Known Exploited Vulnerabilities, referenced across 185 articles.
What is Known Exploited Vulnerabilities?
Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) are software, firmware, or hardware security flaws that credible intelligence or incident data confirm adversaries actively use in real-world cyberattacks.
Expanded Explanation
1. Technical Function and Core Characteristics
KEV are specific security defects for which attackers have demonstrated reliable exploitation against deployed systems. They exist across operating systems, applications, network devices, cloud services, and industrial or Operational technology (OT) platforms.
Show more
Security authorities catalog these vulnerabilities when incident reporting, malware analysis, or threat intelligence confirms active exploitation. They often include a Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) identifier, technical description, affected products, and references to remediation guidance.
2. Enterprise Usage and Architectural Context
Enterprises use the concept of KEV to prioritize vulnerability management, patching, and configuration changes based on observed attacker behavior. Security teams map these vulnerabilities to assets, business services, and data flows to determine exposure.
Architects and security leaders incorporate KEV into risk registers, security baselines, and change management workflows. Many organizations align patch service-level objectives and compliance controls specifically around items listed in government-maintained or industry-maintained known exploited catalogs.
3. Related or Adjacent Technologies
KEV intersect with common vulnerability scoring systems, threat intelligence platforms, and vulnerability scanners. These tools often tag or filter vulnerabilities that authorities or trusted intelligence sources classify as currently exploited in the wild.
They also relate to penetration testing, breach and attack simulation, and Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) use cases, where teams validate whether adversaries can leverage these vulnerabilities within a particular environment. Incident response playbooks frequently reference KEV during investigation and containment.
4. Business and Operational Significance
KEV provide a basis for prioritizing remediation that reduces the observed likelihood of compromise. Executive stakeholders use this category to understand where remediation delays create exposure to techniques that attackers already use.
Regulators and government agencies reference KEV in binding operational directives, sector advisories, and audit expectations. Many enterprises track remediation of these vulnerabilities as a performance metric for cyber risk management and as evidence of due diligence in security governance.
Our definition.